Manganese in drinking water

ResearchBlogging.org
This post was chosen as an Editor's Selection for ResearchBlogging.org
A new study has been appearing in news reports over the past couple of days: a group of researchers found that children drinking water with high levels of manganese had lower IQs than children drinking water with lower levels of manganese. Obviously no parent wants their children to have a lower IQ, but the media reports don’t really provide much information on whether this study indicates any sort of risk to the general population, so I thought I’d take a more in-depth look at the study in the context of what we know about manganese in drinking water supplies.

Manganese (abbreviated Mn)  is a naturally occurring metal that is commonly found in groundwater, with highly variable concentrations. It is also found in food and in soil. It is an essential nutrient, and associated with various enzymes in the body, so you need to ingest some manganese. However, at very high exposures it is a neurotoxin (has adverse effects on the brain).

Health Canada evaluated the toxicity of manganese when developing their drinking water guideline, but that was back in 1975. They concluded that manganese was among the least toxic elements. The drinking water guideline they established, 0.15 mg/L, wasn’t actually based on any sort of health effect, but rather is an aesthetic objective based on undesirable taste and the potential for stains on laundry and plumbing fixtures. Historically, manganese toxicity has mainly been associated with inhalation (primarily occupational exposures).

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) evaluated the toxicity of manganese in 1995; as part of their review they identified a study in which people exposed to manganese concentrations in water 1.6 to 2.3 mg/L had higher (worse) scores on neurobehavioural tests than people drinking water with lower concentrations of manganese. However, even for the high exposure group, exposure from drinking water was lower than expected exposure from food.

Which leads us to the new study by Bouchard et al., conducted in 8 municipalities in Quebec with a range of manganese concentrations in drinking water ranging from 0.001 mg/L to 2.7 mg/L. They measured the manganese concentrations from kitchen taps (after the filter where one was used) to get a reliable estimate of the exposure concentration. They also estimated manganese exposures from food based on semi-quantitative questionnaires, and measured manganese in hair samples, to get a better picture of overall exposure.

They found that manganese intakes from food were about 1000 times higher than those from water (2335 ug/kg/month from food, 1.6 ug/kg/month from water and 1.9 ug/kg/month from water incorporated into food). However, manganese concentrations in hair appeared to be associated with intake from water, but not with intake from food. They then found that high manganese intake from water was associated with lower IQ; again, manganese intake from food did not appear to affect IQ. The difference in IQ between the highest and lowest exposure groups was over 6 points, and a 10-fold increase in manganese was associated with an IQ decrease of 2.4 points.

The first thing I ask myself when I see results like this is whether there could have been any other factors affecting the results – correlation between two variables (e.g. manganese concentration and IQ) does not necessarily mean that one causes the other. The authors looked at the influence of family income, family structure, maternal education, child birth weight, child’s rank in family, maternal smoking, alcohol consumption during pregnancy maternal depressive symptoms, and other factors, and found they did not affect the results significantly. They also looked at concentrations of lead, arsenic, copper and zinc in tap water, in case another substance was causing the effect, but again did not find a significant association. One thing that did show up was that, on average, manganese concentrations were lower at houses with private wells than those using public wells – perhaps there is some difference between people that have private vs. public wells that could account for IQ differences, but since the study accounted for socioeconomic factors there’s nothing obvious. Given that there are other studies indicating that manganese can have potential neurotoxic effects, the conclusion that the reduced IQ scores are probably a result of manganese is reasonable.

The next question is why the association is only with manganese in drinking water, and not in food. The authors speculate that this could arise from different metabolism of manganese from water than food (chemicals are commonly more readily absorbed by the body from water than food). They also suggest there could be differences in the chemical form of manganese, which could affect its toxicity. Since they found that IQ was better correlated with concentrations in tap water than with exposure from water, another suggestion was that it could actually be inhalation of manganese during showering and other activities that results in the toxic effects – which would be consistent with the neurotoxicity observed in occupational inhalation exposures, though there isn’t really any convincing evidence to support this.

So what are the implications for the general population? In this study, discernible effects on IQ were really only evident at high concentrations (greater than 0.1 mg/L). Most Canadian and US water supplies have lower concentrations than this, but not all – it’s not uncommon for manganese to be naturally high in groundwater wells, and even some surface water bodies (e.g. the Carrot River in Saskatchewan was found to have concentrations up to 1.7 mg/L in an Environment Canada study). There are people being exposed to manganese concentrations in drinking water in the range at which effects were observed in other parts of North America as well.

What can we do about this though? High concentrations of manganese in drinking water are usually natural, so it’s not a case of preventing pollution or cleaning up a contaminated aquifer. About all we can do right now is treat water with high concentrations of manganese to reduce the concentrations. Unfortunately this study by itself probably isn’t enough to tell us what the “safe” concentration in water is. I’d personally be concerned about concentrations above the existing Health Canada aesthetic objective of 0.15 mg/L though. Follow-up studies on other populations are needed to confirm these results and to help narrow in on what concentrations in water start to have adverse effects; it would also be useful if these studies include a more in-depth analysis of the chemical form of manganese – if the toxic effect is due to the form present, then a change to water pH or hardness might significantly reduce (or increase) the effect.

Bouchard, M., Sauvé, S., Barbeau, B., Legrand, M., Brodeur, M., Bouffard, T., Limoges, E., Bellinger, D., & Mergler, D. (2010). Intellectual Impairment in School-Age Children Exposed to Manganese from Drinking Water Environmental Health Perspectives DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1002321

10 Responses to Manganese in drinking water

  1. Many thanks for this clear analysis. I had not been aware of this study, and was pleased to be pointed to it.
    My only comment, as a psychologist, is that it would be good if you could also mention the effect size on IQ. Especially with v.large studies, findings are sometimes statistically significant but effects negligible for everyday life. But in this case, there was about a 6 point difference in IQ between highest and lowest exposure groups, which is not trivial.

  2. ashartus says:

    Thanks for the feedback – I’ve added a sentence about the magnitude of the effect.

  3. […] in baby formula Last week I talked about high levels of manganese in drinking water being associated with reduced IQ. A related issue is baby formula – there is typically […]

  4. John Simms says:

    Consider lifetime effect of Mn in drinking water combined with genetic differences that make some persons more sensitive to this element. What is one of the most age related diseases? Of course there are others but Parkinson’s Disease is the most common. No one knows what causes this disease but in high concentrations Mn will cause the symptoms in the manganese producing and using industries. I think Parkinson’s is caused by Mn in lower concentrations, possibly as low as 0.05 mg/liter consumed over a long time. Think about it. I have the symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease and if you think it is bad initially look at what happens over the years of living with it

  5. here says:

    Cool post ! Thanks for, writing on this blog page man. I shall email you some time! I didnt know that!

  6. Brooks says:

    I just like the valuable information you supply to your articles.

    I’ll bookmark your blog and take a look at again here regularly.
    I’m fairly sure I’ll learn lots of new stuff right here!
    Best of luck for the following!

  7. morris says:

    Thanks for this informative piece. am involved in public water supply as a quality manager.iv recently realized one of my bore hole has very high levels of manganese, 1000mg/l.
    what could be the effects of regular drinking of such water???

    • ashartus says:

      Are you sure about that concentration? I’m pretty sure that’s well above the solubility limit of any manganese compounds – do you mean micrograms/litre instead of milligrams/litre? Even if it’s micrograms that’s still on the high end and above drinking water limits in most places.

  8. Kim Shorb says:

    I would like your opinion on our water situation. Just Google Scio, Ohio water and you should see EPA reports and everything

    • ashartus says:

      Kim, I unfortunately don’t have time to do a detailed assessment of Scio’s issues, much as I enjoyed doing this sort of stuff the work I actually get paid for takes up too much of my time to continue without impacting my family life. However from a quick search I’d say the levels in Scio do look high enough to be a concern for drinking, particularly for children, and if I lived there I’d follow the recommendation not to drink the water until the situation is resolved.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: