Human health effects of oil spills and implications for the BP spill
A lot of the media (and scientific) attention to oil spills in the ocean focuses on the effects on marine ecosystems. The ecological effects, particularly in the short term, are undeniable – the pictures of oil-soaked birds are an obvious example. However, less attention is given to the potential effects on human health – both to those living in communities near the spill, and those involved in the spill clean up. A very timely review by Francisco Aguilera and colleagues, published shortly before the recent BP spill, looked at data from other recent spills; some of the conclusions from this review can be extrapolated to look at the human health implications of the BP spill.

The Aguilera et al. review looked at 3 types of studies:

  • in vitro studies and studies on food chain transfer effects;
  • epidemiological studies on acute and psychological effects; and,
  • epidemiological studies on genotoxicity and endocrine toxicity.

The in vitro studies basically indicated that oil from a spill can affect human cells, including affecting the activity of enzymes associated with carcinogenicity – not particularly surprising to me, and not enough by itself to indicate whether actual human health effects would occur. The food chain transfer studies were fairly relevant; they showed that rats fed mussels from an area affected by an oil spill developed DNA damage, and that this damage was correlated with the amounts of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), a type of chemical found in oil and known to have carcinogenic properties. DNA damage does not automatically mean cancer will follow, and these studies do not appear to have been followed up with a long-term cancer bioassay (which is very expensive and time consuming), so this doesn’t definitively mean that eating contaminated mussels would lead to cancer, but there’s enough evidence there that I’d be pretty hesitant to eat shellfish from an area recently affected by an oil spill. Typically vertebrates, including fish, are better at metabolizing the PAH than invertebrates such as mussels, so I would expect the effects to be less from eating fish than shellfish.

A variety of epidemiological studies on acute and psychological effects from oil spills were identified. Many of these involved self-reporting of health effects; while I haven’t had the time to look at the original papers, in general this type of study is subject to biases (e.g. someone living near an oil spill may expect to have health effects, and therefore report having them), so it is hard to draw firm conclusions from these studies. However, there were some studies that looked at more quantifiable effects.

Communities affected by oil spills were found to have higher incidences of generalized anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder shortly after the spill (within a year or so), particularly in aboriginal communities. Given that these communities often have a high level of dependence on the sea, it is perhaps not surprising that worry about their livelihoods being affected would cause stress and anxiety. The area affected by the BP spill has a very different population makeup though, so these results wouldn’t necessarily be directly applicable. There are still going to be people who at least perceive their livelihood or way of life to be affected though, so the potential for psychological effects is there.

Actual health effects in nearby communities over the short-term don’t seem to be very significant. While self-reported poor health was higher in these communities, quantitative measurements of health indicators didn’t seem to show any real effects. However, effects were noted in people responding to oil spills and helping with clean-up, including irritation, body pain, and effects on lung function (generally reversible).

There are also data on genotoxicity and endocrine effects on people involved in oil spill clean-up. Those significantly exposed did show evidence of genetic damage, as well as some hormone changes, and higher than normal levels of heavy metals such as aluminum, nickel and lead in their blood. Genetic damage measured shortly after exposure doesn’t necessarily translate to future cancer, since the body does have repair mechanisms, but it is an indication of carcinogenic potential from the exposure. Only long-term follow up would give a reliable indication, and I don’t think there were enough people in the study groups to get meaningful data.

So what does this mean for the BP spill? I think these data show that health effects in residents of nearby communities aren’t likely from this sort of spill, though psychological effects are possible, and marine food sources should not be harvested from affected areas. Health effects are more likely in volunteers and workers involved in the spill response and clean-up or others directly exposed to the spill; these people should therefore be wearing appropriate protective gear and take other steps to minimize exposures.

Disclaimer: These conclusions are based on generalized extrapolations from other oil spills; since each oil spill is different in terms of the size of release, distribution of contamination, chemical composition of the oil, and setting, they shouldn’t be taken as definitive statements about health effects from the BP spill. However, I think the overall conclusion that health effects are only likely in those directly exposed to the oil (or possibly eating contaminated food sources) is reasonable and supported by our current understanding of the environmental fate and toxicity of crude oil components.

Aguilera, F., Méndez, J., Pásaro, E., & Laffon, B. (2010). Review on the effects of exposure to spilled oils on human health Journal of Applied Toxicology DOI: 10.1002/jat.1521

8 Responses to Human health effects of oil spills and implications for the BP spill

  1. […] The Ashartus Files: A lot of the media (and scientific) attention to oil spills in the ocean focuses on the effects on […]


    That was a very nice write-up there, pls i need ur assistance, am a student of university of ibadan, nigeria. An i need some material from you i dont know weather you can help me. I need materia on genetic implication on oil spill on any organism. thanks.

  3. ashartus says:

    Andem – I would suggest starting with the Aguilera et al. 2010 paper I cited, and then looking up the papers that it cites related to genetic toxicity (if you can’t access the Journal of Applied Toxicology from your university let me know and I’ll try to get you those citations).

  4. […] effects of the BP oil spill Last summer I wrote about a review of the health impacts of oil spills (Aguilera et al., 2010) and attempted to extrapolate the results of that review to the 2010 BP oil […]

  5. onafuye omotunde opeoluwa says:

    Hi, your write up was very useful to me as am writting on the effect of oil spillage, but i need you to write more on the effect on human. Thank you

  6. Health Stores…

    […]Human health effects of oil spills and implications for the BP spill « exposure/effect[…]…

  7. healthy foods to lose weight…

    […]Human health effects of oil spills and implications for the BP spill « exposure/effect[…]…

  8. click here for more info

    Human health effects of oil spills and implications for the BP spill | exposure/effect

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: